Medical futility

OVERVIEW

  • “Futility” means the absence of benefit
  • a consensus definition of medical futility does not exist
  • ~80% of ICU patients who die do so as a consequence of a decision to withhold or withdraw life support
  • it is more useful to consider the utility of any intervention (the balance of benefits and harms) rather than futility

TYPES OF FUTILITY

Waisel and Truog summarise three different conceptual definitions of futility:

  • Physiologic futility — when a procedure cannot bring about its physiologic objective (e.g. when CPR cannot achieve a BP target) — involves a “value choice” of the measurement of organ function rather than the value of the outcome for the patient as the patient might perceive it.
  • “benefit- centred” futility — involves a quantitative estimate of futility is one in which an intervention is considered futile if it has failed in the last defined number of times attempted (e.g.  100 successful attempts as the threshold) or a qualitative component, where the patient’s resulting quality of life falls well below the threshold considered minimal by general professional judgment (e.g.  treatments which merely preserve unconsciousness or cannot end dependence on intensive medical care)
  • Operationalising futility — treatment that is so unlikely to succeed that many people—professional and lay persons—would consider it not worth the cost (aims to precludes individual caregivers from having to make qualitative or quantitative value judgments)

American Thoracic Society definition

  • “highly unlikely” to result in meaningful survival (a mix of quantitative and qualitative components)

American Heart Association definition

  • “no survivors reported under the circumstances in well designed studies “

Critical Care Society definition

  • treatments are  futile only when they will not achieve their intended goal

LIMITATIONS 

  • a therapy should not be provided if the harms outweigh the benefits — futility does not encompass harms, only the absence of benefit
  • potential  risk of causing offence by using  the term
  • risk of harming patient autonomy by using futility as an overriding force

References and Links

Journal articles

  • Ardagh M. Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine. J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):396-9. PMC1733283.
  • Ardagh M. Utility rather than futility in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Oct;23(5):530-1. PMID: 21995466.
  • Danbury C, Newbury C. Futile treatment in intensive care. JICS 2014;15(1):10-11 [Free Full Text]
  • den Hollander D. Medical futility and the burns patient. Burns. 2013 Mar 20. pii: S0305-4179(13)00040-5. PMID: 23523220.

CCC 700 6

Critical Care

Compendium

Chris is an Intensivist and ECMO specialist at The Alfred ICU, where he is Deputy Director (Education). He is a Clinical Adjunct Associate Professor at Monash University, the Lead for the  Clinician Educator Incubator programme, and a CICM First Part Examiner.

He is an internationally recognised Clinician Educator with a passion for helping clinicians learn and for improving the clinical performance of individuals and collectives. He was one of the founders of the FOAM movement (Free Open-Access Medical education) has been recognised for his contributions to education with awards from ANZICS, ANZAHPE, and ACEM.

His one great achievement is being the father of three amazing children.

On Bluesky, he is @precordialthump.bsky.social and on the site that Elon has screwed up, he is @precordialthump.

| INTENSIVE | RAGE | Resuscitology | SMACC

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.