Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease (CMT) is one of the most common inherited neurological disorders, encompassing a group of genetically and clinically heterogeneous peripheral neuropathies. It typically presents as a slowly progressive distal muscle weakness and atrophy, usually beginning in the lower limbs during adolescence or early adulthood, often associated with foot deformities (e.g. pes cavus), distal sensory loss, and absent deep tendon reflexes. Involvement of the upper limbs follows later in the course of the disease.

CMT is classified into several subtypes based on clinical features, electrophysiological findings, mode of inheritance, and increasingly, genetic mutation. These include:

  • CMT1 (demyelinating) – characterised by reduced nerve conduction velocities.
  • CMT2 (axonal) – with relatively preserved velocities but reduced compound muscle action potentials.
  • CMT4 (recessive demyelinating), CMTX (X-linked), and DI-CMT (dominant-intermediate) further enrich the classification landscape.
Epidemiology

CMT affects approximately 1 in 2,500 individuals globally. CMT1A, due to PMP22 gene duplication, is the most common subtype. Both sexes are affected, though some X-linked forms show male predominance.

Clinical Features
  • Onset: typically in the first two decades of life.
  • Motor: foot drop, distal weakness, wasting of the peroneal muscles, claw hand deformities in later stages.
  • Sensory: numbness, tingling, impaired vibration and proprioception.
  • Reflexes: absent ankle jerks.
  • Deformities: pes cavus, hammer toes, scoliosis in some cases.
  • Other: rarely associated with tremor, hearing loss, or diaphragmatic weakness in certain genetic forms.
Investigations
  • Nerve conduction studies (NCS): to differentiate demyelinating (CMT1) from axonal (CMT2) types based on conduction velocities.
  • Electromyography (EMG): to assess the pattern of denervation.
  • Genetic testing: increasingly central in confirming diagnosis and subtype identification.
  • Nerve biopsy: rarely required, but may show onion bulb formations in demyelinating types.
  • MRI and musculoskeletal imaging: may aid in assessing muscle atrophy and skeletal abnormalities.
Management

No curative treatment exists. Management is supportive:

  • Physical therapy and orthotics for mobility.
  • Surgery for severe deformities.
  • Genetic counselling for affected families.

The eponym honours Jean-Martin Charcot and Pierre Marie, who jointly described the condition in Paris in 1886, and Howard Henry Tooth, who independently reported similar findings that same year in his Cambridge MD thesis. The term “Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease” gained currency in the early 20th century to encompass these convergent descriptions of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy.


History of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

1855–1884 – Early reports of familial distal muscular atrophy were published by Virchow (1855), Eulenburg (1856), Hemptenmacher (1862), Friedreich (1873), Hammond (1879), Schultze (1884, 1930), and Ormerod (1884). While these accounts hinted at hereditary neuromuscular disorders, most lacked the consistent clinical pattern or peripheral nerve focus that would later define Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease. Retrospective analysis suggests many described divergent entities, including muscular dystrophies and anterior horn cell disease.

Exceptions include two particularly prescient observations from Nikolaus Friedreich (1825-1882) and Hermann Eichhorst (1849–1921) in 1873.

  • Eichhorst, in Ueber Heredität der progressiven Muskelatrophie, documented a family across six generations with seven members personally examined, outlining what was likely a hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy.
  • Friedreich, in Eigene beobachtungen, provided a detailed histopathological account of nerve fibre atrophy, Schwann cell hyperplasia, and spinal cord involvement — findings later confirmed in 1894 by Georges Marinesco (1863–1938) and now recognised as classical features of demyelinating CMT.

1886Jean-Martin Charcot (1825-1893) and Pierre Marie (1853-1940) describe five patients with a familial, progressive atrophy of distal lower limbs – Sur une forme particulière d’atrophie musculaire progressives , proposing a spinal origin.

Though often criticised for attributing the disorder to myelopathy rather than neuropathy, they acknowledged diagnostic uncertainty and refrained from definitive localisation — a cautious insight given the limited tools of the time.

Est-ce done a une myelopathie que nous avons affaire? est-ce a une nevrite multiple peripherique? Ici, il faut bien l’avouer, la question devient beaucoup plus delicate, en presence surtout de ces cas ou il a existe soit des douleurs, soit des troubles divers de la sensibilite; bien que jusqu’a un certain point l’hypothese d’une myelopathie nous paraisse preferable il nous
semble difficile de se prononcer d’une facpn absolue

Charcot, Marie 1886

Is this a myelopathy? or multiple peripheral neuritis? Here, we must say, the question is more complicated, especially in the presence of cases with either pain or varied sensory disorders; although, up to a certain point, we prefer the hypothesis of myelopathy, it seems difficult to come to a firm conclusion.

Charcot, Marie 1886

1886Howard Henry Tooth (1856-1925) publishes his doctoral thesis in London describing a similar inherited neuropathy, correctly localising it to the peripheral nerves –The peroneal type of progressive muscular atrophy.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Tooth 1886
Progressive atrophy commencing in the peronei, now most obvious in the right calf muscles. Tooth 1886

1912–1920s – Further pathological clarification emerges, differentiating hypertrophic (demyelinating) from neuronal (axonal) forms. In 1927, Sergei Davidenkov (1880–1961) attempted to classify the variegated inherited neuropathies into 12 categories based on clinical and genetic features – Über die neurotische Muskelatrophie Charcot-Marie Klinisch-genetische Studien. However, his classification faced several criticisms and never came into general use.

1968 – Dyck and Lambert propose a clinical-electrophysiological classification: Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy (HMSN) types I (demyelinating) and II (axonal).

1991 – Identification of PMP22 gene duplication as the cause of CMT1A by Lupski et al., marking a breakthrough in genetic understanding.

1993–2000s – Discovery of causative genes for CMT1B (MPZ), CMT2A (MFN2), CMTX1 (GJB1), and others.

2010s–present – Over 100 CMT-associated genes identified. Genetic testing becomes central to classification and diagnosis.

2020s – Novel therapies including gene modulation and antisense oligonucleotides are under clinical trial for subtype-specific interventions.


Associated Persons
  • Friedrich Schultze (1848-1934)
  • Hermann Eichhorst (1849-1921)
  • Nikolaus Friedreich (1825-1882)
  • Jean-Martin Charcot (1825-1893) – French neurologist, foundational figure in modern neurology.
  • Pierre Marie (1853-1940) – French neurologist, collaborator with Charcot, pivotal in early descriptions.
  • Howard Henry Tooth (1856-1925) – English neurologist; first to suggest peripheral nerve origin
  • Johann Hoffmann (1857-1919)
  • Sergei Davidenkov (1880–1961)
  • Peter J. Dyck (b. 1926) – Developed HMSN classification system.
  • James R. Lupski (b. 1957) – American geneticist; discovered PMP22 duplication.

Alternative names
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth-Hoffman disease
  • Dejerine-Sottas Syndrome (CMT3)
  • Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies (HNPP)
  • GJB1 (Connexin 32)-related CMTX1
  • Dyck Classification of Inherited Neuropathies
  • PMP22 duplication disorders

References

Historical articles

Review articles

eponymictionary

the names behind the name

BA MA (Oxon) MBChB (Edin) FACEM FFSEM. Emergency physician, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital. Passion for rugby; medical history; medical education; and asynchronous learning #FOAMed evangelist. Co-founder and CTO of Life in the Fast lane | Eponyms | Books |

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.