Critical Debrief: Clinical Event Debriefing

Critical Debrief: Episode 4: DEEP DIVE – Clinical Event Debriefing

What is clinical event debriefing, how does it differ from the simulation debriefing we all know, and how do you actually make it routine in a busy ED? Emergency clinicians Prof Walter Eppich and A/Prof Andrew Coggins join host Kit Rowe and the team for a deep dive.

Host: Kit Rowe  |  Panel: Pramod Chandru, Caroline Wilson  |  Guests: Prof Walter Eppich (University of Melbourne), A/Prof Andrew Coggins (Westmead)

Overview:

  • The panel works through what “clinical event debriefing” (CED) really means and how it differs from simulation debriefing. It follows a real patient event, is rarely planned, and often happens when the team is most emotionally activated.
  • A central thread is aligning intention with impact. They distinguish debriefing to learn, to manage, and to treat, and the risks of drifting into psychological treatment without the training for it.
  • They argue for routine, brief, learning-oriented debriefs build the skills and psychological safety a team needs before the critical case arrives.
  • Further discussions on who should facilitate teh debrief (and why it shouldn’t default to the team leader), end-of-shift check-ins, “coffee and cases,” M&M as after-action review, and “who debriefs the debriefers?”

Episode Timestamps

  • 02:08 – What is clinical event debriefing?
  • 03:04 – CED vs simulation debriefing
  • 04:36 – Key differences: a real patient, usually unplanned, compressed time
  • 09:09 – Is CED only for “sinister” events? Reconciling experience with its potential role
  • 11:05 – Learning vs caring for traumatised staff; aligning intention and impact
  • 14:51 – Support at 3am without a psychologist: psychological first aid (look, listen, link)
  • 16:59 – The learn–manage–treat spectrum; the COVID-era genesis of the BMJ paper
  • 21:46 – Who should lead a debrief?
  • 27:34 – Debriefing the shift rather than the single event. Translational simulation
  • 30:16 – The STOP5 hot-debrief tool
  • 30:47 – What to ask in a routine end-of-shift debrief
  • 32:08 – Pramod’s case (fat embolus, cardiac arrest)
  • 33:21 – Andrew’s observational study; check-ins and building psychological safety
  • 35:44 – Peer support and the loss of community on becoming a consultant
  • 38:53 – Making sense of an event with a trusted colleague
  • 41:28 – Preparing peers to debrief each other
  • 43:46 – Community of practice; separating coaching/mentorship from debriefing
  • 46:03 – Walter’s case story: an overnight paediatric tragedy and an informal debrief
  • 48:35 – Structure and frameworks: use one, keep it simple; humility as a leader
  • 51:01 – Shared understanding and ground rules as the core of a safe debrief
  • 54:11 – Debriefing in retrieval medicine; “coffee and cases”
  • 56:02 – “Just start debriefing”

References & Resources (in order of discussion)
  1. Kolbe M, Schmutz S, Seelandt JC, Eppich WJ, Schmutz JB. Team debriefings in healthcare: aligning intention and impact. BMJ. 2021 Sep 13;374:n2042.
  2. Keiser NL, Arthur W. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 2021 Jul;106(7):1007-1032.(~11:44)
  3. Keiser NL, Arthur W Jr. A meta-analysis of task and training characteristics that contribute to or attenuate the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief). Journal of Business and Psychology. 2022. (~11:54)
  4. Rose S, Cheng A. Charge nurse facilitated clinical debriefing in the emergency department. CJEM. 2018 Sep;20(5):781-785. (~22:24)
  5. Walker CA, McGregor L, Taylor C, Robinson S. STOP5: a hot debrief model for resuscitation cases in the emergency department. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;7(4):259-266. (~30:16)
  6. Coggins A, Santos AL, Zaklama R, Murphy M. Interdisciplinary clinical debriefing in the emergency department: an observational study of learning topics and outcomes. BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):79. (~33:21)
  7. Petrosoniak A, Gabriel J, Purdy E. Stop asking if it works, start making it happen: exploring barriers to clinical event debriefing in the ED. CJEM. 2022 Nov;24(7):673-674.(~56:28)
  8. Phillips EC, Smith SE, Tallentire V, Blair S. Systematic review of clinical debriefing tools: attributes and evidence for use. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Feb 19;33(3):187-198. (~57:14)
  9. Schmutz JB, Lei Z, Eppich WJ. Reflection on the Fly: Development of the Team Reflection Behavioral Observation (TuRBO) System for Acute Care Teams. Acad Med. 2021 Sep 1;96(9):1337-1345. (~59:47)
  10. Rose SC, Ashari NA, Davies JM, Solis L, O’Neill TA. Interprofessional clinical event debriefing-does it make a difference? Attitudes of emergency department care providers to INFO clinical event debriefings. CJEM. 2022 Nov;24(7):695-701. 

Background reading (referenced in planning; not discussed on air)


Listen in your favourite apps

The Critical Debrief

[email protected]

FACEM in Westmead and Nepean Hospitals in Sydney, Australia. Lead on Network Five Emergency Medicine Journal Club. I have a special interest in medical education, research and simulation.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.