Trauma and Pregnancy Redux

aka Trauma Tribulation 007

The patient from Trauma Tribulation 006 has arrived in the emergency department. She is a 27 year-old female who is 32 weeks pregnant. As she is transferred onto the trauma table you notice she looks uncomfortable and has a horizontal seat-belt bruise across her lower abdomen.

You have already considered how the physiological changes of pregnancy may affect trauma management. Now you’re going to have to make some management decisions.


Questions

Q1. What is the significance of the seat-belt bruise in this patient?

Answer and interpretation

Fetal injury is more likely in a motor vehicle crash if the lap-belt is incorrectly placed across the uterus rather than across the thighs.


Q2. In general, how does the pattern of injury in pregnancy-related trauma differ from trauma in the non-pregnant patient?

Answer and interpretation

Trauma affects up to 7% of pregnancies (only a minority require hospitalisation).

Specific injuries

  • traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock are the most common mechanisms of death.
  • liver injury, spleen injury, and retroperitoneal hemorrhage are all more common.
  • bowel injury is less common due to protection by the uterus.

Uterine injury

  • assaults of pregnant women tend to target the uterus.
  • uterine injury may coexist with pelvic fractures.
  • Uterine injury is rare in blunt trauma (e.g. uterine rupture, placental abruption) but carries the risk of premature labour.  Direct fetal injury occurs in less than 1% of blunt trauma.
  • In penetrating trauma, the uterus tends to protect other organs, but fetal mortality is much higher.

Always consider the possibility of domestic violence in the pregnant trauma patient.


Q3. What key principles should be remembered when considering investigations in the management of trauma in the pregnant patient?

Answer and interpretation
  • If an investigation is needed to optimise the management of the mother it should be performed as usual.
  • Use imaging modalities that are free of ionising radiation whenever feasible and appropriate (especially ultrasound).

Q4. What is a safe amount of radiation exposure, and how does this vary, in the pregnant patient?

Answer and interpretation

Consequences of radiation exposure from imaging are unlikely to be significant in most situations, but there is greater potential for harm in the first trimester.

  • <5 rad has not been associated with an increase in fetal anomalies or pregnancy loss and can be considered ‘safe‘ at any stage of pregnancy.
  • More than 5-10 rad is potentially risky, and is associated with an increased risk of childhood cancer even in the later stages of pregnancy.

Radiation exposure varies with different types of imaging, different equipment and different imaging protocols. In general, radiation exposure to the mother (not necessarily the fetus) for different types of imaging is:

  • Chest XR ~ 0.5 rad to the lungs, and very little to a shielded abdomen.
  • pelvic XR ~ 1 rad
  • abdominopelvic CT ~ 5-10 rad.

But the estimated fetal exposure for various radiographic studies is considerably lower:

  • Radiographs
    • Cervical spine XR 0.002 rad
    • Chest (two view) XR 0.00007 rad
    • Pelvis XR 0.040 rad
    • Thoracic spine XR 0.009 rad
    • Lumbosacral spine XR 0.359 rad
  • CT scans (10 mm slices)
    • Head CT <0.050 rad
    • Chest CT <0.100 rad
    • Abdomen CT 2.60 rad

However it is worth consulting a radiologist to calculate estimated fetal dose when multiple diagnostic X-rays or CT scans need to be performed.

[Apologies for the old fashioned use of the rad, which seems to be prevalent in medicine — 100 rad is equivalent to 1 Gray.]


Q5. Which pregnant trauma patients should have continuous fetal monitoring? What type of monitor should be used and what is the minimum recommended monitoring period?

Answer and interpretation

Continuous fetal monitoring is required for at least 4-6 hours at >24 weeks gestation. Before 24 weeks the fetus is pre-viable, and monitor will not alter the outcome.

Cardiotocography (CTG) should be used, as it is a useful predictor of outcome.


Q6. When is continuous monitoring and further evaluation of the pregnant trauma patient required beyond the initial observation period?

Answer and interpretation

Continuous monitoring and further evaluation by an obstetrician is required if any of the following is present:

  • uterine contractions
  • non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern
  • vaginal bleeding
  • significant uterine tenderness or irritability
  • serious maternal injury
  • rupture of the amniotic membranes

Emergency caesarean section may be required.


Q7. Outline your overall approach to the management of a pregnant trauma patient.

Answer and interpretation

Activate Trauma Call and notify the on-call Obstetrician.

An approach to the management of the pregnant trauma patient:

  • Primary survey and resuscitation
    • ABCs with C-spine precautions
  • Determine if >24 weeks pregnant(uterus should be palpable above the umbilicus, which is reached at ~20 weeks)
    • if <24 weeks, then ‘ignore pregnancy’ and treat the mother according to your standard approach (no obstetric interventions will alter the outcome of a pre-viable fetus)
    • if>24 weeks, tilt backboard 15-30 degrees to the left to prevent supine hypotension syndrome
  • Perform secondary survey (including PV exam and assessment of the uterus) and commence CTG monitoring.
    • if the mother is unstable
      • resuscitate and treat cause
    • if the mother arrests:
      • perform peri-mortem caesarean section in the ED, starting within 4 minutes of arrest ideally, if fetal heart tones detectable. Fetal survival has been reported at >20 minutes, but neurological outcome is partly determined by time to delivery post-maternal arrest.
      • If there are no fetal heart tones detectable, peri-mortem caesarean section may be considered in the hope of facilitating resuscitation of the mother. Otherwise it may be appropriate to stop resuscitation.
    • if the mother is stable, or stabilises with resuscitation
      • if CTG is stable then continue CTG monitoring for at least 4-6 hours.
  • if CTG shows distress then obtain an emergency ultrasound and consider emergency Caesarean section.

Consider Rhesus status and Anti-D IgG in all pregnant patients >12 weeks gestation.


References
  • Cusick SS, Tibbles CD. Trauma in pregnancy. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007 Aug;25(3):861-72, xi. PMID: 17826221.
  • Marx JA, Hockberger R, Walls RM. Rosen’s Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice, 7th edition (2009) Mosby, Inc. [mdconsult.com]
  • Resus.ME — EAST Guidelines on Trauma in Pregnancy.

Trauma Tribulation back

CLINICAL CASES

Trauma Tribulation

Chris is an Intensivist and ECMO specialist at the Alfred ICU in Melbourne. He is also the Innovation Lead for the Australian Centre for Health Innovation at Alfred Health and Clinical Adjunct Associate Professor at Monash University. He is a co-founder of the Australia and New Zealand Clinician Educator Network (ANZCEN) and is the Lead for the ANZCEN Clinician Educator Incubator programme. He is on the Board of Directors for the Intensive Care Foundation and is a First Part Examiner for the College of Intensive Care Medicine. He is an internationally recognised Clinician Educator with a passion for helping clinicians learn and for improving the clinical performance of individuals and collectives.

After finishing his medical degree at the University of Auckland, he continued post-graduate training in New Zealand as well as Australia’s Northern Territory, Perth and Melbourne. He has completed fellowship training in both intensive care medicine and emergency medicine, as well as post-graduate training in biochemistry, clinical toxicology, clinical epidemiology, and health professional education.

He is actively involved in in using translational simulation to improve patient care and the design of processes and systems at Alfred Health. He coordinates the Alfred ICU’s education and simulation programmes and runs the unit’s education website, INTENSIVE.  He created the ‘Critically Ill Airway’ course and teaches on numerous courses around the world. He is one of the founders of the FOAM movement (Free Open-Access Medical education) and is co-creator of litfl.com, the RAGE podcast, the Resuscitology course, and the SMACC conference.

His one great achievement is being the father of two amazing children.

On Twitter, he is @precordialthump.

| INTENSIVE | RAGE | Resuscitology | SMACC

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.