CICM SAQ 2010.1 Q2

Question

Compare and contrast the utility of the following in the assessment of acute kidney injury in a critically ill patient:

  • Creatinine clearance
  • Serum creatinine
  • Urea
  • Urine output measurements
  • Novel biomarkers

Answers

Answer and interpretation

Creatinine clearance

  • Gives estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
  • Requires timed urine collection (usually 24 hours).
  • Accuracy may be limited due to creatinine secretion, thus overestimating GFR, and incomplete urine collection.
  • Assumes steady state in GFR, which may not be the case in acute renal failure.
  • Determining exact GFR is rarely clinically necessary.

Serum creatinine

  • Simple to measure and widely available.
  • Specific for renal function.
  • Indicator of GFR based upon constant production from muscle creatine and relatively constant renal excretion rate.
  • Production may be increased by trauma, fever or immobilisation.
  • Decreased in individuals with small stature, cachexia, reduced muscle mass (eg muscle disease, amputations)
  • Decreased production may occur in liver disease because of decreased hepatic conversion of creatine to creatinine, decreased dietary protein intake, muscle wasting and increased renal tubular secretion of creatinine.
  • May be influenced by volume of distribution changes in critically ill patients

Urea

  • Simple to measure and widely available
  • Not specific for renal function
  • May be affected by liver disease, protein intake, catabolic state, volume status, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and drug therapy – eg corticosteroids.

Urine output measurements

  • Simple to measure and universally available.
  • More sensitive to changes in renal function than biomarkers
  • Non-specific – can have normal urine output despite severe acute renal failure

Novel biomarkers

  • Include a plasma panel (NGAL and cystatin C) and urine panel (NGAL, IL-8 and KIM-1)
  • Represent sequential biomarkers and so have potential for timing the initial insult and assessing the duration of AKI and for predicting overall prognosis
  • May also distinguish between various types and pathogeneses of AKI
  • Potential for high sensitivity and specificity
  • So far only tested in small studies and limited clinical situations and need further validation
Exams LITFL ACEM 700

Examination Library

CICM

Chris is an Intensivist and ECMO specialist at The Alfred ICU, where he is Deputy Director (Education). He is a Clinical Adjunct Associate Professor at Monash University, the Lead for the  Clinician Educator Incubator programme, and a CICM First Part Examiner.

He is an internationally recognised Clinician Educator with a passion for helping clinicians learn and for improving the clinical performance of individuals and collectives. He was one of the founders of the FOAM movement (Free Open-Access Medical education) has been recognised for his contributions to education with awards from ANZICS, ANZAHPE, and ACEM.

His one great achievement is being the father of three amazing children.

On Bluesky, he is @precordialthump.bsky.social and on the site that Elon has screwed up, he is @precordialthump.

| INTENSIVE | RAGE | Resuscitology | SMACC

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.