Köhler teardrop

In a normally positioned pelvis, the teardrop is formed by tangential projection of several bony surfaces. Anatomical studies identify the:

• the lateral limb with cortex in the anterior part of the acetabular fossa,
• the medial limb with the medial pelvic wall near the plane of the posterior acetabular margin, and
• the inferior arc with the superior anterior margin of the obturator foramen.

Because different cortical surfaces become tangential to the X-ray beam with pelvic rotation and tilt, the shape and position of the teardrop vary with projection.

The teardrop is used as a landmark in assessment of acetabular morphology and dysplasia, acetabular fractures, protrusio acetabuli, hip-joint effusion and postoperative hip arthroplasty measurements. Its use as an absolute landmark for reconstructing the centre of rotation after total hip arthroplasty is limited by patient-related variation, although it remains useful for serial intraindividual comparison.

---

History of the Köhler teardrop

1905 – Alban Köhler (1874–1947) described the teardrop-shaped radiographic appearance in Die normale und pathologische Anatomie des Hüftgelenks und Oberschenkels in röntgenographischer Darstellung. Medial to the large acetabular contour he identified an elongated, superiorly open curved figure “…etwa von der Form eines herabfallenden Wassertropfens oder einer sogenannten Glasthräne.” […approximately in the form of a falling water drop or a so-called glass tear.]

Köhler investigated the appearance using lead-wire markers, skeletal preparations, stereoscopic radiographs and multiple projections. He found that the lines did not correspond simply to visible bony ridges or edges, but arose from projected surfaces within and around the acetabulum. He observed that the configuration changed with age and X-ray projection. He found it was relatively consistent in children but more dependent on tube position and pelvic orientation in adults.

1910 — In the first edition of Lexikon der Grenzen des Normalen und der Anfänge des Pathologischen im Röntgenbilde, Köhler incorporated the appearance into his general radiology reference work. He wrote that the three projected lines formed a figure remotely resembling a tear, which he had therefore called the Tränenfigur, adding that the term had already found general acceptance. The four principal projectional configurations were illustrated as Fig. 49 A–D.

1961 – Sharp used the teardrop as a reference point in construction of the radiographic acetabular angle for assessment of acetabular dysplasia.

1964 – Robert Judet, Jean Judet and Émile Letournel used the term “U structure” for the teardrop in their study of acetabular fractures, incorporating its integrity into radiographic assessment of acetabular fracture patterns.

1969 – M. J. S. Hubbard used the teardrop together with the Köhler line to assess protrusio acetabuli.

1977 – R. Kölbel and H. Golzo undertook a detailed experimental study of the anatomical substrate of the Köhlersche Tränenfigur. Using serial radiographs with progressive pelvic rotation and tilt, together with radiographs of serial bone sections, they demonstrated that the teardrop was a dynamic summation shadow, with different cortical surfaces contributing according to projection.

In the normal AP position they identified:

• the lateral limb as a narrow cortical region in the anterior acetabular fossa;
• the inferior arc as the superior anterior border of the obturator foramen;
• the medial limb as cortex of the medial pelvic wall at approximately the level of the posterior acetabular margin.

1982 – Bowerman, Sena and Chang further examined The teardrop shadow of the pelvis: anatomy and clinical significance, contributing to the modern anatomical interpretation of the structure.

1987 – Sweeney, Helms, Minagi and Louie described an increased teardrop distance as a plain-radiographic indicator of hip-joint effusion in adults.

2023 – Heinz et al. evaluated the Köhler teardrop as a landmark for the centre of rotation after total hip arthroplasty. In 250 pelvic radiographs, its relationship to the hip centre varied with sex, age, height and weight. Pelvic tilt had relatively little effect, but the authors concluded that the teardrop was not sufficiently reliable as an absolute landmark for centre-of-rotation reconstruction, while remaining useful for intraindividual serial comparison.

---

Associated Persons

• Alban Köhler (1874–1947)

---

Alternative names

• Name
• Name

---

Eponymythology

Köhler’s attribution is well supported by his detailed 1905 primary description. He initially compared the appearance with a Wassertropfen (“water drop”) and Glasthräne (“glass tear”), and subsequently used Tränenfigur (“tear figure”). The German eponym Köhlersche Tränenfigur became established, whereas English-language literature generally favoured teardrop, pelvic teardrop or U-figure.

The Köhler teardrop should not be confused with the Köhler line. Both emerged from Köhler’s investigation of the radiographic anatomy of the acetabulum and medial pelvic wall, but they describe distinct projected landmarks.

---

References

Historical references

• Köhler A. Die normale und pathologische Anatomie des Hüftgelenks und Oberschenkels in röntgenographischer Darstellung. Hamburg: Lucas Gräfe & Sillem; 1905: 15-24
• Köhler A. Lexikon der Grenzen des normalen und der Anfänge des pathologischen im Röntgenbilde. 1910: 95-99
• Köhler A. Grenzen des normalen und Anfänge des pathologischen im Röntgenbilde. 4e, 1924: 160-164
• Köhler A. Röntgenology: The Borderlands of the Normal and Early Pathological in the Skiagram. Trans. Arthur Turnbull. William Wood. 1928: 187-194
• Hubbard MJ. The measurement of progression in protrusio acetabuli. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1969 Jul;106(3):506-8. 

Eponymous term review

• Vare VB Jr. The anatomy of the pelvic tear figure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952 Jan;34-A(1):167-9.
• Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43-B(2):268–272.
• Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Dec;46:1615-46.
• Kölbel R, Golzo H. Die Köhlersche Tränenfigur. Untersuchungen zur Beziehung von Röntgenbild und anatomischem Substrat [Köhler’s “tear drop”. Relationship between the radiologic picture and anatomic substrate]. Rofo. 1977 Oct;127(4):326-33. 
• Bowerman JW, Sena JM, Chang R. The teardrop shadow of the pelvis; anatomy and clinical significance. Radiology. 1982 Jun;143(3):659-62.
• Sweeney JP, Helms CA, Minagi H, Louie KW. The widened teardrop distance: a plain film indicator of hip joint effusion in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Jul;149(1):117-9
• Heinz K, Nowack D, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Wassilew G, Matziolis G, Brodt S. “Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Sep;143(9):5671-5676.