fbpx

Trifascicular Block

Diagnostic criteria

True trifascicular block refers to the presence of conduction delay in all three fascicles below the AV node (RBBB, LAFB, LPFB), manifesting as bifascicular block and 3rd degree AV block. One of two ECG patterns is present:

  • 3rd degree AV block + RBBB + LAFB or;
  • 3rd degree AV block + RBBB + LPFB

The ventricular escape rhythm usually arises from the region of either the left anterior or left posterior fascicle (distal to the site of block), producing QRS complexes with the appearance of RBBB plus either LPFB or LAFB respectively.

Impending trifascicular block

Other rare indicators of trifascicular block include:

  • Normal sinus rhythm with alternating LBBB/RBBB
  • RBBB with alternating fascicular blocks on a beat-to-beat basis

These herald impending failure of all three fascicles and associated 3rd degree AV block.

A clinical misnomer

The term “trifascicular block” is most commonly used clinically to describe bifascicular block associated with 1st degree AV block or 2nd degree AV block.

  • This term is inaccurate, as the conduction delay resulting in PR interval prolongation usually occurs in the AV node, not in the third remaining fascicle
  • There is no difference in progression to complete heart block in patients with bifascicular block versus those with bifascicular block and associated 1st degree AV block or 2nd degree Mobitz I block (1% risk per year)
  • The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society (AHA/ACCF/HRS) recommends against the use of the term “trifascicular block”, as it does not have a unique anatomical association and does not accurately reflect the underlying anatomical disease process

Clinical Implications

  • Patients with true trifascicular block (associated third degree AV block) will require pacemaker insertion
  • Patients with bifascicular block and syncope or presyncope should be admitted for monitoring and likely pacemaker insertion (class II)
  • Asymptomatic bifascicular block with first degree AV block is not an indication for pacing (class III)

Main Causes

Causes are similiar to those of bifascicular block, related to degeneration or conduction impairment in fascicles below the AV node:


ECG Examples

Example 1
trifascicular-3 2

True Trifascicular Block:

  • Right bundle branch block
  • Left axis deviation (Left anterior fascicular block)
  • Third degree heart block

Example 2
ECG90714 CHB RBBB Trifascicular

Example 3 (previously termed “incomplete trifascicular block”)
trifascicular-block 2

Bifascicular block + first degree AV block

  • Right bundle branch block
  • Left axis deviation (= left anterior fascicular block)
  • First degree AV block

Commonly referred to clinically as “incomplete trifascicular block”, this represents conducting disease of two fascicles, with delayed conduction through either the AV node or the remaining third fascicle. It is not possible to differentiate between the two based on the ECG alone


Clinical Cases


Further reading

References

Online

Textbooks


ECG LIBRARY

MBBS (UWA) CCPU (RCE, Biliary, DVT, E-FAST, AAA) Adult/Paediatric Emergency Medicine Advanced Trainee in Melbourne, Australia. Special interests in diagnostic and procedural ultrasound, medical education, and ECG interpretation. Editor-in-chief of the LITFL ECG Library. Twitter: @rob_buttner

Emergency Medicine Specialist MBChB FRCEM FACEM. Medical Education, Cardiology and Web Based Resources | @jjlarkin78 | LinkedIn |

2 Comments

  1. Braunwald’s Text book of Cardiology states:
    “Bidivisional block in the presence of prolongation of the PR interval (first degree AV block) may indicate disease of the third subdivision rather than disease of the AV node and is associated with a greater risk of complete heart block than if first degree AV block is absent”

    • Hi Rehman
      It is not possible to determine whether the conduction delay resulting in PR interval prolongation is occurring in the AV node or in the third remaining fascicle. Despite this, there is no difference in progression to complete heart block, or in incidence of symptomatic bradyarrhythmias, in patients with bifascicular block versus those with bifascicular block and associated 1st degree AV block (1% risk per year)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.