Rapid sequence airway (RSA) and PALM

Reviewed and revised 7 March 2015

OVERVIEW

Rapid sequence airway (RSA)

  • Rapid sequence airway (RSA) is a modified form of rapid sequence intubation that uses an LMA inserted following induction (+/- administration of neuromuscular blockade) to maximise peri-intubation oxygenation prior to endotracheal tube insertion
  • Apneic oxygenation with nasal prongs or CPAP, and delayed sequence intubation (DSI) are alternative strategies for difficult to pre-oxygenate patients

Pharmacologically assisted laryngeal mask insertion (PALM)

  • PALM is a related technique called pharmacologically assisted laryngeal mask insertion, which involves the use of induction agents to facilitate LMA placement in lieu of rapid sequence intubation
  • unlike the RSA approach, neuromuscular blockade is not administered as part of the PALM approach
  • it is included in the UK Faculty of Prehospital Care Guidelines, but the consensus was not supported by the Royal College of Anaesthetists
  • its role is primarily in the pre-hospital environment in rare circumstances with the following criteria according to UK Faculty of Prehospital Care Guidelines:
    • hypoxic patient for whom rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is not possible and other basic measures have been exhausted e.g. polytrauma patients with a reduced level of consciousness and ongoing airway obstruction, or airway soiling from facial injuries
    • used as a rescue technique, not as a primary airway management strategy
    • should be checklist driven
    • should involve use of at least a second generation supraglottic airway device (SAD)
    • ETCO2 monitoring is mandatory
    • should only be carried out by trained, competent practitioners (training should in-hospital insertion of SADs, simulation training and training in the transfer of critically ill patients)

These techniques are controversial, and are primarily considered in the prehospital environment where RSI is also controversial in certain circumstances (e.g. level of training, relative merits of less invasive airway measures and potential for delayed transfer).

PROS AND CONS OF RSA

(compared to standard RSI)

Advantages

  • maintains patent airway for apnoeic oxygenation
  • allows CPAP to maintain oxygenation during apnea
  • allows PPV to prevent respiratory acidosis during apnea
  • allows gastric decompression via gastric port on LMA prior to intubation (benefit is questionable)
  • has been used

Disadvantages

  • more complex
  • LMA difficult to insert/ use in selected patients (RODS: Restricted mouth opening, Obstruction, Distorted airway, Stiff lungs or c-spine)
  • requires ablation of airway reflexes (by deep sedation or paralysis) in an inadequately preoxygenated patient before an LMA can be inserted
  • LMA does not provide definitive protection against aspiration
  • minimal experience and evidence base is scant (few case reports)

Similar pros and cons apply to PALM, though the risks are greater as there is a longer and indefinite period until a definitive airway will be obtained

VIDEO

RSA approach demonstrated by Darren Braude:


References and Links

LITFL

Journal articles

  • Braude D, Richards M. Rapid Sequence Airway (RSA)–a novel approach to prehospital airway management. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;11(2):250-2. PMID: 17454819.
  • Braude D, Southard A, Bajema T, Sims E, Martinez J. Rapid sequence airway using the LMA-Supreme as a primary airway for 9 h in a multi-system trauma patient. Resuscitation. 2010 Sep;81(9):1217. PMID: 20599313.
  • Moss R, Porter K, Greaves I; Consensus Group Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care. Pharmacologically assisted laryngeal mask insertion: a consensus statement. Emerg Med J. 2013 Dec;30(12):1073-5. PMID: 24232013.
  • Southard A, Braude D, Swenson K, Sullivan A (2010) Using Rapid Sequence Airway to Facilitate Preoxygenation and Gastric Decompression Prior to Emergent Intubation. J Anesthe Clinic Res 1:113. [Free Full Text]

FOAM and web resources


CCC 700 6

Critical Care

Compendium

Chris is an Intensivist and ECMO specialist at the Alfred ICU in Melbourne. He is also the Innovation Lead for the Australian Centre for Health Innovation at Alfred Health and Clinical Adjunct Associate Professor at Monash University. He is a co-founder of the Australia and New Zealand Clinician Educator Network (ANZCEN) and is the Lead for the ANZCEN Clinician Educator Incubator programme. He is on the Board of Directors for the Intensive Care Foundation and is a First Part Examiner for the College of Intensive Care Medicine. He is an internationally recognised Clinician Educator with a passion for helping clinicians learn and for improving the clinical performance of individuals and collectives.

After finishing his medical degree at the University of Auckland, he continued post-graduate training in New Zealand as well as Australia’s Northern Territory, Perth and Melbourne. He has completed fellowship training in both intensive care medicine and emergency medicine, as well as post-graduate training in biochemistry, clinical toxicology, clinical epidemiology, and health professional education.

He is actively involved in in using translational simulation to improve patient care and the design of processes and systems at Alfred Health. He coordinates the Alfred ICU’s education and simulation programmes and runs the unit’s education website, INTENSIVE.  He created the ‘Critically Ill Airway’ course and teaches on numerous courses around the world. He is one of the founders of the FOAM movement (Free Open-Access Medical education) and is co-creator of litfl.com, the RAGE podcast, the Resuscitology course, and the SMACC conference.

His one great achievement is being the father of two amazing children.

On Twitter, he is @precordialthump.

| INTENSIVE | RAGE | Resuscitology | SMACC

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.