Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Grading Systems

OVERVIEW

  • clinical and radiological grading systems exist
  • none of the grading systems have high sensitivity or specificity
  • grading inaccurate if there is acute hydrocephalus, post-ictal state and medications
  • half of patients with poor grades on admission have good outcomes
  • clinical grades are better at predicting outcomes, radiological grades are better at predicting vasospasm

CLINICAL

GCS (Teasdale and Jennett, 1974)

  • not a true SAH grading scale
  • only GCS 14 and 15 correlate with good outcomes, lower scores have poor predictive power
  • motor score is most important

Hunt and Hess (1968)

  • I – asymptomatic or mild headache
  • II – moderate-severe headache, meningism and no weakness
  • III – mild alteration in mental status
  • IV – depressed LOC and/or hemiparesis
  • V – posturing or comatose

subjective, was intended as a guide to surgical risk

WFNS (1998)

  • I – GCS 15, no motor deficit
  • II – GCS 13-14, no motor deficit
  • III – GCS 13-14, motor deficit
  • IV – GCS 7-12 +/- motor deficit
  • V – GCS 3-6, motor deficit present or absent

more objective, but reliant on accurate GCS

RADIOLOGICAL

Fisher (1980)

  • I – no blood
  • II – diffuse deposition of SAH without clots or layers of blood >1mm
  • III – localized clots and/or vertical layers of blood 1mm or > thickness
  • IV – diffuse or no subarachnoid blood but intracerebral or intraventricular clots

validated to predict likelihood of vasospasm, minimal inter-observer variability

Claassen Scale (2004)

  • 5 grades

predicts risk of delayed cerebral ischemia, combines additive risk from SAH and IVH

Ogilvy and Carter (1998)

  • combines clinical and radiological findings
  • combination of age, Hunt-Hess grade, Fisher grade, and aneurysm size and age
  • studies of this are flawed
  • minimal inter-observer variability

CCC Neurocritical Care Series

Journals

  • Claassen J, Vu A, Kreiter KT. Effect of acute physiologic derangements on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Critical care medicine. 32(3):832-8. 2004. [PMID 15090970]
  • Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 6(1):1-9. 1980. [PMID 7354892]
  • Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 42(5):959-68; discussion 968-70. 1998. [PMID 9588539]
  • Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale. Journal of neurosurgery. 68(6):985-6. 1988. [PMID 3131498]
  • Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocritical care. 2(2):110-8. 2005. [PMID 16159052]
  • Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet (London, England). 2(7872):81-4. 1974. [PMID 4136544]

Critical Care

Compendium

Chris is an Intensivist and ECMO specialist at The Alfred ICU, where he is Deputy Director (Education). He is a Clinical Adjunct Associate Professor at Monash University, the Lead for the  Clinician Educator Incubator programme, and a CICM First Part Examiner.

He is an internationally recognised Clinician Educator with a passion for helping clinicians learn and for improving the clinical performance of individuals and collectives. He was one of the founders of the FOAM movement (Free Open-Access Medical education) has been recognised for his contributions to education with awards from ANZICS, ANZAHPE, and ACEM.

His one great achievement is being the father of three amazing children.

On Bluesky, he is @precordialthump.bsky.social and on the site that Elon has screwed up, he is @precordialthump.

| INTENSIVE | RAGE | Resuscitology | SMACC

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.