Factor VIIa

CLASS

  • recombinant protein

MECHANISM OF ACTION

  • tissue factor + VIIa + platelets -> platelet aggregation -> production of platelet-fibrin matrix -> haemostasis
  • used in massive transfusion senario to attempt to control intractable haemorrhage

DOSE

  • need two doses 20min apart
  • expensive
  • need platelets for rFVIIa to be effective

INDICATIONS

Consider rFVIIa when patient has had:

  • 10 RBC
  • 8U FFP
  • 2U Plts
  • 2U Cryoprecipitate
  • warfarin has been reversed
  • heparin has been reversed
  • anti-fibrinolytic agents (tranexamic acid) have been considered
  • requires T >35 C
  • pH >7.2
  • platelets > 100
  • fibrinogen >1

-> rFVIIa 100mcg/kg, wait 20 min and repeat

ADVERSE EFFECTS

  • DVT/ PE

EVIDENCE

  • initially developed for haemophilia
  • good theoretical basis
  • encouraging case reports from use in trauma
  • may avoid problems with ongoing transfusion – disease transmission, acute lung injury, TRALI, hypothermia, acid-base disturbance, volume overload
  • probable publication bias -> tendency to publish cases where it has produced successful results
  • massive transfusion and trauma -> off licence use

Mayer, S.A., et al (2005) “Recombinant Activated factor VII Intracerebral Haemorrhage Trial Investigators. Recombinant activated factor VII for acute intracerebral haemorrhage” N Engl J Med 352:777-785

  • Multicentre RCT
  • n = 399 with acute intracerebral haemorrhage
  • single IV injection of recombinant factor VIIa (40, 80 or 160mcg/kg) VS placebo within 1 hour of their base line CT head scan.
    -> significant reduction in volume of haematoma on CT @ 24 hours with therapy proportional to dose.
    -> significant reduction in 30 day mortality without increase in severely disabled patients.
    -> no statistically significant increase in thromboembolic events although there was a trend.

Levi, M. et al (2010) “Safety of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Randomized Clinical Trials” NEJM 363:79, pages 1791-800

  • goal = evaluate the rate of thromboembolic risk in all published RCT’s using rFVIIA
  • trials = 35
  • n = 4468

Strengths

  • arterial thromboembolic events: coronary, cerebral, other arterial events
  • venous thromboembolic events:
    -> all well defined end-point with appropriate investigations.
  • dose adjusted (< 80, 80-120, >120mcg/kg)
    -> similar ages and dose exposures

-> thromboembolic rate = 11.1%
-> significant increase in arterial thromboembolic rate (5.5% vs 3.2% with P < 0.05) -> likely to be coronary in origin.
-> no significant difference in venous thromboembolic rate
-> risk factors: > 65 years, higher dose, treatment for spontaneous CNS bleeding

AN APPROACH

  • use in life threatening bleeding in trauma and massive transfusion
  • use as per local protocols
  • consider use in ICH
  • vigilance regarding possible increase in thrombosis risk (especially coronary)

CCC Pharmacology Series

Critical Care

Compendium

Chris is an Intensivist and ECMO specialist at The Alfred ICU, where he is Deputy Director (Education). He is a Clinical Adjunct Associate Professor at Monash University, the Lead for the  Clinician Educator Incubator programme, and a CICM First Part Examiner.

He is an internationally recognised Clinician Educator with a passion for helping clinicians learn and for improving the clinical performance of individuals and collectives. He was one of the founders of the FOAM movement (Free Open-Access Medical education) has been recognised for his contributions to education with awards from ANZICS, ANZAHPE, and ACEM.

His one great achievement is being the father of three amazing children.

On Bluesky, he is @precordialthump.bsky.social and on the site that Elon has screwed up, he is @precordialthump.

| INTENSIVE | RAGE | Resuscitology | SMACC

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.